
Rendering Techniques: SSG, SSR, CSR, ISR & RSC

Introduction
Rendering in web development refers to the process of converting code (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) into a visually displayed web page. Different rendering techniques determine where and when this conversion happens. The choice of technique impacts performance, SEO, user experience, and development complexity.
The main rendering techniques are:
- SSG (Static Site Generation): Pages are pre-rendered at build time into static HTML files.
- SSR (Server-Side Rendering): Pages are rendered on the server for each request.
- CSR (Client-Side Rendering): Pages are rendered in the user's browser using JavaScript.
- ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration): A hybrid approach combining SSG and SSR, offering benefits of both.
- RSC (React Server Components): A component-level approach that allows some components to be rendered on the server, reducing client-side load.
Each approach has strengths and trade-offs, making them suitable for different use cases.
1. SSG (Static Site Generation)
- Definition: The HTML for each page is generated at build time and stored as a static file. When a user requests a page, the server directly serves the pre-built HTML file.
- Process
- During the build process, an SSG tool fetches data and generates static HTML.
- These HTML files are deployed to a server or CDN.
- When a user requests a page, the pre-generated HTML is served instantly.
- Analogy: Imagine a restaurant that prepares and packages all meals in advance. When you order, they simply hand you a pre-made package. Great for speed, but limited in customization.
- Example Use Cases: Content that doesn't change often, such as blogs, documentation sites, and marketing websites.
- Advantages:
- Extremely fast performance: Since pages are pre-built, they load incredibly quickly.
- Excellent SEO: Search engines can easily crawl and index static HTML files.
- Highly scalable: Serving static files puts minimal load on the server, allowing you to handle large traffic spikes.
- Disadvantages:
- Not ideal for dynamic content: Requires a rebuild every time content changes.
- Long build times for large sites: Generating all pages at build time can be time-consuming for sites with a lot of content.
- Interactivity challenges: Requires careful consideration to implement interactive features.
- Popular Frameworks: Gatsby, Next.js (partial functionality)
2. CSR (Client-Side Rendering)
- Definition: The server sends a minimal HTML page with JavaScript files. The JavaScript then fetches data and renders the content in the user's browser.
- Process
- Browser requests HTML from the server.
- Server sends a minimal HTML file with JavaScript.
- JavaScript fetches data and dynamically updates the UI.
- Analogy: Think of a restaurant with empty tables. You order, and they cook everything fresh in front of you. Offers flexibility and customization but takes more time.
- Example Use Cases: Web applications and single-page applications (SPAs) that require a high degree of interactivity, like Gmail, Facebook, and Twitter.
- Advantages:
- Fast initial server response: The server only needs to send a small HTML file.
- Rich interactivity: JavaScript enables complex user interfaces and dynamic updates.
- Disadvantages:
- Slow initial load time: Users may see a blank page while waiting for JavaScript to load and render content.
- SEO challenges: Search engines may not fully index JavaScript-rendered content.
- JavaScript dependency: If JavaScript fails to load or execute, the page may not function correctly.
- Popular Frameworks: React, Angular, Vue.js
3. SSR (Server-Side Rendering)
- Definition: The server generates the full HTML page on every request, including fetching data and rendering dynamic content.
- Process
- During the build process, an SSG tool fetches data and generates static HTML.
- These HTML files are deployed to a server or CDN.
- When a user requests a page, the pre-generated HTML is served instantly.
- Analogy: A restaurant that pre-cooks most of the dishes. When you order, they quickly assemble and serve a nearly ready meal. Good balance of speed and customization.
- Example Use Cases: Websites with frequently changing data, such as e-commerce sites with live pricing and news websites.
- Advantages:
- Fast initial page load: Users see the content quickly because the server sends a fully rendered page.
- Good for SEO: Search engines can easily crawl and index the server-rendered HTML.
- Better for low-powered devices: The server handles the heavy lifting of rendering, making it easier for low-powered devices to display the page.
- Disadvantages:
- Slower server response time: The server needs to render the page on each request, which can increase response times.
- Increased server load: Rendering pages on the server consumes more server resources.
- Popular Frameworks: Next.js, Nuxt.js
4. ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration)
- Definition: A hybrid approach that combines the benefits of SSG and SSR. Pages are initially generated at build time (like SSG) but can be re-generated on demand or at set intervals.
- Process
- A page is generated at build time, just like SSG.
- When a user visits the page, if the defined revalidation time has passed, the page is updated in the background.
- The next request receives the newly regenerated page.
- Analogy: A restaurant that pre-makes some popular dishes but also cooks to order. Offers both speed and freshness.
- Example Use Cases: Websites that need fast initial page loads with periodic updates.
- Advantages:
- Fast initial page load: Users get the speed benefits of SSG.
- Up-to-date content: Pages are regenerated periodically, ensuring content freshness.
- Reduced server load: Not all pages need to be rendered on every request.
- Disadvantages:
- Not ideal for real-time content: There might be a delay between when content is updated and when the page is regenerated.
- Popular Frameworks: Next.js
5. RSC (React Server Components)
- Definition: A component-level rendering technique within React that allows certain components to be rendered exclusively on the server. This reduces the amount of JavaScript sent to the client, improving performance.
- Process
- The browser requests a page.
- Server renders React components (server components handle backend logic and data fetching).
- Client components (for interactivity) are hydrated in the browser.
- The server streams the rendered content progressively to the client.
- Example Use Cases: React applications, especially those built with Next.js, where you want to optimize performance and reduce bundle sizes.
- Advantages:
- Improved performance: Reduces the amount of JavaScript sent to the browser, leading to faster initial load times.
- Enhanced server-client collaboration: Allows for efficient data fetching and rendering by separating server-side logic from client-side interactivity.
- Disadvantages:
- Relatively new technology: Still evolving, with limited resources and best practices available.
- Learning curve: Requires understanding of new concepts and patterns within React.
Comparison Table
Feature | SSG | CSR | SSR | ISR | RSC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rendering Location | Build time | Browser | Server | Hybrid | Server (component-level) |
When Rendered | Build process | After initial HTML load | On each request | Build time & on request (with regeneration) | Component-level, streamed |
Where Rendered | Server | Browser | Server | Server | Server + Client |
HTML Delivery | Pre-generated HTML files | Minimal HTML shell | Fully rendered HTML | Pre-generated or on-demand | Streamed, component-level |
Initial Load | Fastest | Slower | Fast | Fast | Fast, progressive |
SEO | Excellent | Can be challenging | Good | Excellent | Good, optimized |
Performance | Fastest | Fast after first load | Moderate | Fast | Efficient |
Interactivity | Limited initially | High | High (after hydration) | High | High (Client Components) |
Server Load | Lowest | Low | Higher | Moderate | Moderate |
Dynamic Content | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes, with periodic updates | Yes, optimized |
Complexity | Build process complexity | Simpler initial setup | More complex setup | Moderate | Learning curve |
Ideal Use Cases | Static sites, blogs, documentation | Web applications, SPAs | E-commerce, news sites | Sites with frequently updated content | Next.js apps with React 18+ |
Conclusion
Each rendering technique serves a specific purpose. SSG and ISR are great for fast-loading static content, SSR works well for dynamic pages with SEO needs, CSR enables rich interactivity, and RSC optimizes component-level performance. Choosing the right approach depends on your application's requirements and performance goals.